Your illustrations coincide with mine. The reason we do not attempt to utilize cats as carriers of loads all over the world, is not because we cannot distinguish cats from donkeys, but because we recognize difference of use. In presence of the similar recognition, all of my exposition follows directly.
I explicitly allude to this application in my post, meaning you merely reiterate what I already have said, yet simultaneously mischaracterize what I already have said. Perhaps you did not read the post carefully, or exhaustively, as such did not arrive at a representative understanding of essence of my post.
It is important that we realize that just because it is said differently, does not imply it differs in its essence. This, of course, is an important stylized fact that increasingly is becoming a challenge in a society that promotes branding of oneself over arrival at community.