You did not respond to my comment and show with your expertise that your understanding of the article discussed is superior.
Experts demonstrate expertise with evidence not with a mere blase declaration of expertise. I have a PhD from a top 50 business school in the United States, I know and practice standards of intellectual discourse. Your response is anything but intellectual.
When an intellectual is given an out and still chooses name calling — am an expert you are not — as a response, there is evidence of rigidity of opinion not open to discussion of evidence. Are you saying here that if you gave a talk on this subject and were asked a question your response would be “you misunderstand because you are not an expert? ” Really?
I am moving on from this discussion. Do not bother to respond to my response to your response, which was in response to my initial response to your post.
Sometimes discussions are not amicable. Let’s not be amicable, even though my original response was amicable, but let’s be decent and not get nasty.
Let’s just leave this right here exactly where it is.