Which part of the author’s post stating she has been dating did you miss? The woman states clearly and unequivocally that she remains single because she has not found anyone as yet. More so, if things were to work out, she longs for a child in context of marriage.
If she was looking to marry a woman, she wouldn’t need marriage for having of children.
Just because a woman is unwilling to change to market herself, does not imply an objective and astute philosopher such as myself cannot point out meaningful, non-compromising changes that can help her land the beau she is interested in landing, but has yet to find.
It is an exercise in false feminism to imply altruistic advice from a guy to a gal about what she can change to make herself more appealing to guys is an exercise in beat down.
Is this not the substance of makeover shows on TV?
And by the way, why exactly does a disagreement have to end in vitriole and diatribe? Just because you disagree with my comment does not give you the right to insult or to attempt to convey you know me as a person.
For the record, just because you can pen a response to my post does not imply you know me, or that there is any merit to your response.
The author of the post laughed out loud when she read my post, I suggest you take a cue from her feminist response.