It is true that demand for high profile publications has become source of lots of imperfections within the academic community.

If universities in their hiring and retention strategies will weigh innovativeness of work alongside journal profiles, there at least would be some attempt at balance. If academics know there are two dimensions for weighing their work, namely:

Quality of publication itself — innovativeness of the research work, which used to be extremely important many years back, but now has become almost irrelevant,


Quality of journal in which the work is published;

This will do more to improve the status quo than the current system within which all that seemingly matters is the ranking of the journal. There are thousands of articles published in top journals that never really get any mention subsequently, meaning journal quality in of itself is not sufficient evidence of a high quality or impactful research endeavor.

Written by

Educator and Researcher, Believer in Spirituality, Life is serious business, but we all are pilgrims so I write about important stuff with empathy and ethos

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store