Artificial Intelligence: The Case for ‘Rational Curiosity’ not ‘Mere Curiosity’?

If man is to get Artificial Intelligence (AI) right, first there is the necessity that it gets the Philosophy of AI (PoAI) right. If man is to get PoAI right, necessarily a PoAI is, simultaneously a Philosophy of Man, as such a Philosophy of a Reasoned, equivalently Rational-Intentioned Man (PoRM). The question then is, what are the parameters that, ideally ought to be imposed on a PoAI that has qualification, simultaneously as a component of a PoRM? Stated somewhat differently, we arrive at the following question, namely:

With PoRM in tow, what exactly are the candidate boundaries that can, or ought to be imposed on a Rational Intentionality of Man (RoM), in this specific instance, on a Rational Implementation of AI (RoAI), such that the progression to AI is bounded by a robustly formulated PoAI?

There exist lots of boundaries that can be imposed on a RoM, such as, “is it an expression of a Virtue of Man (VoM)?” But that question leads to a bottomless cesspool of heterogeneity of opinions, not only on what exactly constitutes a VoM, but also on how exactly to apply the VoM to the formulation of a…